Indefinite Relative – Esquire Magazine


Always tricky, these indefinite relatives. This one even more so (and illustrative) because the writer truncated the clause, i.e. the clause isn’t stated explicitly but is rather implied: ‘to whomever else [wanted them]’. And therein lies the problem. Just because the clause isn’t explicitly stated doesn’t mean the grammar doesn’t apply. The ‘whom’ in ‘whomever’ is there because of the ‘to’. But ultimately the ‘to’ is irrelevant to the ‘whomever’. The whole clause is the object of ‘to’; the grammar of ‘whomever’ is beholden to its clause rather than to ‘to’. And because it is the subject, albeit of an implied clause, though a subject nonetheless, it should ‘whoever’ rather than ‘whomever’.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s